PDA

View Full Version : Alberta's oil sands royalties surge


nds76
03-08-2006, 9:49am
It is the silver lining to the platinum cloud: Alberta's revenue will jump by hundreds of millions this year as the soaring price of crude pushes oil sands megaprojects into a higher royalty bracket.

The province is already swimming in record energy income, which will top $14.3-billion in fiscal 2005-06, according to the budget update released last week.

But most of that comes from natural gas royalties of $8.2-billion. Oil sands royalties are a distant fourth, with $1.2-billion projected for the current fiscal year, even though just under half of Canada's crude production comes from the megaprojects of northern Alberta.

The reason for the discrepancy — the generous royalty breaks that Alberta has extended to the oil sands sector, which allow a project to pay a much lower rate until it has recouped its initial capital investment. So, many new projects will have to earn billions before they start paying the higher rate, when royalties typically rise eightfold.

But Syncrude Canada Ltd., the second-oldest oil sands project, has already started to pay higher rates, since it will shortly exhaust its credits. And that will give Alberta — already racking up a budget surplus of more than $10-billion for 2005-06 — an additional half a billion dollars in oil sands royalties for this year.

Canadian Oil Sands Trust, with a 35-per-cent stake in Syncrude, will pay out an extra $163-million to the province, spokeswoman Siren Fisekci said. Syncrude as a whole will pay out an additional $460-million.

Ms. Fisekci said her trust's expenses have risen, but it is simply a reflection of the bigger boom in revenue at Syncrude. “It's tied to your profitability.”

When it still had the full shelter of royalty credits last year, Canadian Oil Sands paid just $20-million in royalties, or a 1-per-cent levy on gross revenue. For this year, those credits aren't fully exhausted, so the trust will pay an 18-per-cent royalty on net revenue. After that, the rate rises to 25 per cent.

Canadian Oil Sands and the other Syncrude owners began paying the 18-per-cent rate in January, so part of those increased fees would be paid in the current fiscal year. Their full impact won't be felt until fiscal 2006-07, however.

The other members of the Syncrude joint venture include ConocoPhillips Co., Imperial Oil Ltd., Mocal Energy Ltd., Murphy Oil Company Ltd., Nexen Inc., and Petro-Canada.

Syncrude is not alone in paying higher royalties. According to the provincial government, two oil sands projects moved from the lower rate to the higher one between October and December, with 34 now paying the 1-per-cent royalty and 29 paying the 25-per-cent levy.

http://ctv2.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060307.walbertaa0307/business/Business/businessBN/ctv-business

canoilers
03-08-2006, 9:58am
Thats exactly what Fort Mac needs, more greed. :p

Roger
03-08-2006, 11:09am
Most people don't realize how much oil there is in the oil sands. It has not been economic to extract it in the past because it is in the form of tar. It requires large amounts of natural gas to convert the oil sands into usable crude. Fortunately, Alberta is swimming in natural gas too. But there is as much oil in these sands as there is in all Saudi Arabia. Now oil is reliably above $50US per barrel, it is economic to start exploiting it.

The USA can supply only a fraction of the oil it needs and is desperate to find a reliable foreign source for the future. I'm sure that these days Alberta looks a whole lot more stable and reliable than anywhere in the Middle East. But the Americans have been a little slow to show an interest in the Alberta oil. Already deals have been made with the Chinese and the Americans are in danger of having to play catch up in benefitting from this new source of oil.

One thing is for sure. The cost of oil can only go up. If you want to find a place to invest, go with Alberta oil.

canoilers
03-08-2006, 11:16am
From what I heard theres like 7 times the amount of Oil up there than all of the middle east, but that varies on who you ask. The tar is actually called bitumen and its synthetic oil that they produce, its not actaully Crude Oil.

Heres a link to the Oil Sands discovery centre.

Oil Sands (http://www.oilsandsdiscovery.com/oil_sands_story/story.html)

canoilers
03-08-2006, 11:17am
I hear back in the old day it used to seap into the Athabasca River. The natives used it on their canoe's for water proofing.

Roger
03-08-2006, 12:08pm
The tar is actually called bitumen and its synthetic oil that they produce, its not actaully Crude Oil.



Um, okay. Well the link you cite says "synthetic crude". Anyway, thanx for the link.

The point is though this oil source will transform the Canadian economy. Already the Canadian dollar is surging toward the US dollar in value and in fact is surging against the Euro, the pound, etc. too. Before long we will have a repeat of my younger days when the Canadian dollar was worth more than the US dollar. Unintentionally, this rise in our dollar is killing our manufacturing industries. Happily, it makes it cheaper for Canadians to travel abroad again. Unhappily, the wealth in Alberta will put strains on Confederation. The implications go on and on. We ain't seen nuthin' yet!

canoilers
03-08-2006, 12:36pm
You're right, I'm sorry for the mistake.

canoilers
03-08-2006, 12:45pm
Heck I've heard things about Northern Alberta spliting from Alberta for the same reason people want Alberta to break away from Canada.

nds76
03-08-2006, 12:54pm
I would rather the US get it's oil from our neighbour Canada, a stable nation and a friend. Middle East sources are not stable and the price of oil can go up on a whim.

David